View Single Post
Old 2013-02-09, 06:15
joshuajohn89 joshuajohn89 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 342
I do not understand the poor reception to this suggestion so far; I think the option for such a fail-safe is an excellent idea.

I do, however, imagine that for the system to 'fail gracefully' (i.e., without any nasty artifacts at the moment of transition) the lower sample rate(s) must be running concurrently with the primary, which itself would add to the processor's load, I think.

Mind you, I don't know much about these sorts of things, so this is really just conjecture on my part, but I still think it is a very interesting idea.

Last edited by joshuajohn89; 2013-02-09 at 06:21.