Propellerhead Software

Go Back   Propellerhead Forum > Feature Suggestion Forum

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 2009-08-15, 22:22
solomank solomank is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2
I love you: Please improve audio quality

Love note

After years of waiting, I am forced to sacrifice Reason's sweet fast paced workflow for the superior audio quality offered by Logic, and others, even though their high powered synthesizers offer thousands of redundant, dated sounds.

Software developers: Please understand - I have loved the work you have done. I have appreciated the simple boundaries offered by your programs. They have forced me to grow, and they have given me untold hours of engagement. Time wasted? No.

Software developers: Please understand - I don't need new things. I need better sound quality. I have improved my signal paths with careful eqs and compression, but side by side, sound by sound, reason does not compare with the others. Reluctantly, I have agreed to stop finishing things in reason.

I build tracks up, massaging, tuning, loving, but yet hiding from my beloved reason that I will be exporting its midi to another program to finish the track. To another program that offers crisper, more detailed, more spatially separated synthesizer voicings, to another program that sounds better.

I love Reason, but it becomes more and more like the angry relative that doesn't really explain things that well to outsiders, and I'm approaching a time when I won't be inviting it around anymore.

Two suggestions, because I love you Reason:
First: improve whatever processes contribute to making sample playback, mixing, and synthesizer sounds sound more professional. I don't care about increasing the load on my cpu. Make it sound better. I hate apologizing to my friends about the basic differences between logic and reason.

The other: improve the Matrix pattern sequencer. Sequencing with the Matrix is like touching my girlfriends raw liquid sugar. It is so simple and powerful. But it can be improved. I want to develop patterns that are longer than 32 steps without toggling between pattern A1 and A2 and A3 and A4 and A5. I want to develop patterns that are taller than 13 notes without toggling through the 5 levels of octaves.
I could do this on the piano roll sequencer, but it's not that much fun. Expanding the Matrix or making a newer, larger rackmount matrix style sequencer with horizontally scrolling, vertically expandable viewing options would be the best thing you could ever do.

Unless you were to develop a VST that combined a higher fidelity version of your Subtractor synth with said expanded matrix components. Would I buy it? Absolutely.
  #2  
Old 2009-08-15, 22:57
lowlifebware lowlifebware is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,216
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by solomank View Post
Sequencing with the Matrix is like touching my girlfriends raw liquid sugar.
Can you explain this please, I have no idea what this bit means?

B
  #3  
Old 2009-08-17, 10:23
rfitz's Avatar
rfitz rfitz is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 419
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowlifebware View Post
Can you explain this please, I have no idea what this bit means?

B
Do you want him to include pictures
__________________
Check out some of my tunes at: http://soundcloud.com/devicehigh

Here's one to start with:
Loading SoundCloud…
  #4  
Old 2009-08-16, 00:29
mattias800's Avatar
mattias800 mattias800 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 723
Quote:
Originally Posted by solomank View Post
a higher fidelity version of your Subtractor synth
You mean Thor?
__________________
mattias800/mono
Loading SoundCloud…
  #5  
Old 2009-08-16, 11:04
phasys's Avatar
phasys phasys is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,888
Quote:
Originally Posted by solomank View Post
First: improve whatever processes contribute to making sample playback, mixing, and synthesizer sounds sound more professional. I don't care about increasing the load on my cpu. Make it sound better. I hate apologizing to my friends about the basic differences between logic and reason.
You might want to read up a bit on how to improve your sound with Reason.
__________________
"Having unlimited choices can paralyze you creatively." - David Byrne

"Some questions simply do not deserve an answer." - Richard Dawkins

https://soundcloud.com/dutch-bastard

omfg one million megahurz CPU
  #6  
Old 2009-08-17, 19:03
kage630
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
i would like to see what would happen if the same producers who contributed to native instruments' "massive" stock soundbank threw down on some thor combinator patches.

i'm really not sold on this nay-saying reason's sound quality bandwagon, and i'm not going to be until some seriously talented sound designers try their hand at developing synth patches for reason.
  #7  
Old 2009-08-19, 18:08
typewriter typewriter is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 248
Upgrade to Record. There you have a SSL desk. That should sound good enough.

But in any case I do not understand that people don't get it that other DAWs have a slightly higher output (some decibel plus) compared to Reason. That's all. This makes the sound "so much better". And that has been discussed here a thousand times.
  #8  
Old 2009-08-19, 18:52
bw120205 bw120205 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 327
I've realized that there are trade-offs with any route you take in your quest for sonic perfection. For a while I used the Arturia MiniMoog VST for synth sounds and NI's Battery for drum sounds but the CPU load on my computer become so annoying and intense that I was willing to give up some clarity for the ability to have more tracks and a greater amount of automation and what not. Maybe you have a really great computer that can run multiple VST's simultaenously, which in that case go for it! If you are me and have a laptop with 2 gigs of Ram then you will get a headache. If sonic clarity and overall realism is what you seek then definitely go with some nice VST's. There is no comparison that they sound better than the sounds in Reason, but I tend to favor being able to work with a ton of sounds at the same time.
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What if Reason 3 had an optional add on "Audio In" feature? dominik18s General Forum (read only) 9 2005-01-06 20:22
the truth about reasons audio quality =) olefski General Forum (read only) 39 2003-11-05 19:18
Echo Introduces Indigo Laptop Audio Card for MacOSX / PC EnochLight General Forum (read only) 1 2003-01-02 16:55
A question for Reason and Sonar users? Audio Quality... DjDarkside General Forum (read only) 7 2002-12-05 01:12
Audio or midi interface BillyBlagg General Forum (read only) 5 2002-11-09 00:23


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:33.