Propellerhead Software
Old 2012-07-13, 08:37
BoddAH's Avatar
BoddAH BoddAH is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 312
Cool Is the "Reason sound" gone?

Let's suppose something like that ever existed. And some talented engineers could recognize the characteristic and subjectively inferior sound of some of the older (and most CPU friendly ever) Reason devices in a song, is the Reason sound definitely gone with the advent of Rack Extensions?

Let's assume Propellerhead engineers always were so obsessed with stability and CPU efficiency that they cut corners on sound quality on all of their devices, would a song made 100% with third party Rack Extensions be indistinguishable from the same song created with the same devices on another DAW?

Just curious if that "Reason sound" argument people keep throwing around is finally moot.
Old 2012-07-13, 09:04
platzangst's Avatar
platzangst platzangst is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,349
Originally Posted by BoddAH View Post
Just curious if that "Reason sound" argument people keep throwing around is finally moot.
It was always moot.

It was always a spectacularly dumb argument.

But if someone has it in their head that there was some kind of identifiable "sound" to the Reason devices, and that such a sound was in some way bad, then obviously the fact that parties other than Propellerhead are now contributing their own DSP code to various Rack Extensions should by sheer logic mean that there is no more guarantee of a "Reason sound" to be had. You can have a partially Korg and Softube sound if you like. Or now, a Mellotron sound with Sugar Bytes. Or whatever.

People who are dead set on dissing Reason will find something else to gripe about, make no mistake.
Hey go listen to my new album it's almost like music.
Loading SoundCloud…

Old 2012-07-13, 09:15
Mizio Mizio is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 447
In my opinion the old devices still sound terrible. Compare nnxt with ableton sampler, or subtractor with the new polysix, you will notice a huge difference.

I still prefer the audio been produced with ableton live! More dynamic and definition using few internal audio effects!
Old 2012-07-13, 09:45
scifunk's Avatar
scifunk scifunk is offline
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 926
Generally, the sound of a DAW is down to the skills of the person using it. However, if you have samples that are 24bit, 96khz and pre-produced then they are going to sound better then a bog standard sound coming out an unaffected softsynth
Scientific Funk & Cactus Jack - deep house, tech-house and techno
Old 2012-07-13, 10:03
neonkoala neonkoala is offline
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 16
I have never had a problem with the sound of the Reason synths. You did, however, convince me to try out the Korg PolySix Rack Extention...
Old 2012-07-13, 10:05
ryszard's Avatar
ryszard ryszard is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 691
To summarize (and as has been said above) it comes down to the skill of the operator and the quality of the samples.

Keyboard magazine published an interview with the product manager for Prophet synthesizers. People talked then about how the sounds of certain synths were so readily identifiable. The PM commented that he was astonished at how many synths came back for service with the unmodified factory patches. It was a fully variable synth and anybody could have created their own. Most people, though, seem to wait for individuals like Brian Eno, Suzanne Ciani, and other sound designers to do it for them.

If your synth sounds like it did when it came from the factory, who's to blame? Anybody can complain. Usually it's the lazy and unimaginative who do. The creators are too busy getting things done. In which class do you place yourself?
Old 2012-07-13, 10:17
Benedict's Avatar
Benedict Benedict is offline
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,926
If you use the new Pulsar as an OSC then you are in a new (and lovely) place.

Benedict Roff-Marsh
- - - - - - - - - -
Music: Bandcamp
ReFills: OSC + Filter - Super Mono-Synth
Old 2012-07-13, 10:45
particlejunkie's Avatar
particlejunkie particlejunkie is offline
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 2,548
Don't mean to toot my own horn but I've consistently gotten "you made that in reason?" comments from folks ever since reason 2.5 when they introduced the vocoder. To this day even I am surprised what you can get out of subtractor+fx alone.

Brought to you by Carl's Jr.
Old 2012-07-13, 10:50
LastAlternative's Avatar
LastAlternative LastAlternative is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,048
There is a 'Reason sound' if all one does is uses patches without any alteration whatsoever.
"Life is a movie, you're a star."
"Don't waste your talents."
"Give music life!"
Old 2012-07-13, 10:57
madmacman madmacman is offline
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 447
Originally Posted by beerski View Post
There is a 'Reason sound' if all one does is uses patches without any alteration whatsoever.
Well, "Reason sound" (i.e. using presets) is not a disadvantage

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why should "Reason Record" take up a USB space with an ignition key? quawatkins Phead User Forum (read only) 44 2011-05-22 14:15
Digital Doctor sez "Reason steadily losing market share" PicklePimientoLoaf General Forum (read only) 49 2011-03-30 15:10
Goodbye, "Reason Electric Bass" ReFill . . . RockExtension Phead User Forum (read only) 8 2011-01-09 13:37
Just Some Interesting Reason Music, Minus That "Reason Sound" NewAtlantisAudio Phead User Forum (read only) 2 2010-10-03 22:02

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 04:39.