Propellerhead Software
Old 2012-08-30, 06:09
joeyluck's Avatar
joeyluck joeyluck is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,519
This idea being that, VSTs could be "encased" as REs by individual developers for their own products (not a RE that can load VSTs) Does that make sense?
Old 2012-10-09, 23:00
slevin slevin is offline
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 264
Originally Posted by joeyluck View Post
This is a picture of something I proposed before on the platform of "more flexible UI." My idea was that developers could keep their GUI (their vision without making compromises to great instruments) and in some fashion, still have the extra "bonus" that is the back panel.

I was merely thinking in terms of RE. However, if a VST could run inside the RE SDK, with some editing to allow for back panel connectivity, all the concepts of RE ("better inetgration," "undo," stability - not crashing the host" would still exist). Essentially, it would look like a rackmount, touch-screen like this... =)
Can't be done. The Rack view in reason is a tightly controlled collection of GUI widgets and templates and audio code. Breaking that interdepence will introduce some pretty noticeable responsiveness issues with reason. Specially after you have several of these high-powered instruments running at the same time in you project.

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rack Extension installation location djejreason69 Phead User Forum (read only) 13 2012-06-17 23:20
Rack Extension Ratings SteveDiverse Phead User Forum (read only) 11 2012-06-15 12:29
Rack Extension Developers: Introducing Themselfes beanos Phead User Forum (read only) 35 2012-03-24 19:39
Musings on a Rack Extension Anomecron Phead User Forum (read only) 15 2012-03-22 13:55

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:50.