Propellerhead Software

Go Back   Propellerhead Forum > Feature Suggestion Forum

View Poll Results: VST?
YES! Vst integration! 84 43.30%
NO Vst integration! 110 56.70%
Voters: 194. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 2013-08-22, 12:57
Rapletes Rapletes is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 5
Exclamation VST vote

Instead of debating over having VST integration in Reason, lets have a poll to show what the PH customers want. Vote

Last edited by Rapletes; 2013-08-22 at 13:04.
  #2  
Old 2013-08-22, 13:40
Recurse's Avatar
Recurse Recurse is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 352
I voted yes. Can't see any reason NOT to have the option. There are many other things I'd rather the Props worked on first though.
__________________
My slave name before I was turned on myself is totally immaterial. As far as I'm concerned your slave name is equally pointless.
  #3  
Old 2013-08-22, 14:39
guitfnky's Avatar
guitfnky guitfnky is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Recurse View Post
I voted yes. Can't see any reason NOT to have the option.
stability?
ease of use?
  #4  
Old 2013-08-22, 15:08
HiddenOutsideTheBox's Avatar
HiddenOutsideTheBox HiddenOutsideTheBox is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 69
This again?! With Re's I think there is 0.000001% chance of props adding VST compatibility. Hard Reason nuts don't want it for the stability reason. But with Midi out there are now work arounds to get VSTs into Reason.

But I for one feel it's now unnecessary so long as the Re's keep releasing at a decent rate and demand for them remains high. In a couple of years they'll be almost on par I think.
__________________
Web | HiddenOutsideTheBox | Soundcloud | Twitter | Facebook |

"Music is my religion." Jimi Hendrix

Loading SoundCloud…
  #5  
Old 2013-08-22, 15:30
BonezMcCoy's Avatar
BonezMcCoy BonezMcCoy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,702
Quote:
Originally Posted by guitfnky View Post
stability?
ease of use?
I don't think Propellerhead will ever implement AU/VST support, after all they have their own protocol right now. However, this stability argument is a bit dated. I have no crashes running multiple plugins in my DAW in 2013. If the code is good, it won't crash. Some Reason users have had crashes since REs were introduced, but once the problem REs get updated the problem goes away. Also, a device is not necessarily easier to use because it is not an AU/VST, if anything, ABL2 RE is more difficult to use than its AU/VST counterpart since everything, including step sequencer, is readily available without the need of hooking it up to other devices.
  #6  
Old 2013-08-22, 15:54
guitfnky's Avatar
guitfnky guitfnky is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonezMcCoy View Post
I don't think Propellerhead will ever implement AU/VST support, after all they have their own protocol right now. However, this stability argument is a bit dated. I have no crashes running multiple plugins in my DAW in 2013. If the code is good, it won't crash. Some Reason users have had crashes since REs were introduced, but once the problem REs get updated the problem goes away. Also, a device is not necessarily easier to use because it is not an AU/VST, if anything, ABL2 RE is more difficult to use than its AU/VST counterpart since everything, including step sequencer, is readily available without the need of hooking it up to other devices.
VSTs (from my admittedly limited understanding) are a much more 'open' protocol than REs. I'm sure for most of the higher-end VSTs done by better known developers, you're right. I could see stability being a much bigger problem for lesser-known, 'cheaper' VSTs, where the developer just sort of slapped it together for fun or whatever. then there's the issue of how well those VSTs play with each particular DAW. with REs, Propellerhead ensures that there is a certain level stability by making the developer get approval before they'll put it into the shop. of course it's not going to be completely bulletproof, but Reason with REs is still way more stable than other DAWs I've used.

and my point about ease of use was more aimed at installation and maintenance of the plugin/RE. back when I used to actually use VSTs, I recall a number of times where I had to go through a bunch of BS just to get them installed and working properly with Digital Performer. Rack Extensions, by comparison are stupidly easy. go to the store, try/buy it, let it download and authorize, and open Reason.
  #7  
Old 2013-08-22, 16:17
BonezMcCoy's Avatar
BonezMcCoy BonezMcCoy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,702
Quote:
Originally Posted by guitfnky View Post
VSTs (from my admittedly limited understanding) are a much more 'open' protocol than REs. I'm sure for most of the higher-end VSTs done by better known developers, you're right. I could see stability being a much bigger problem for lesser-known, 'cheaper' VSTs, where the developer just sort of slapped it together for fun or whatever. then there's the issue of how well those VSTs play with each particular DAW. with REs, Propellerhead ensures that there is a certain level stability by making the developer get approval before they'll put it into the shop. of course it's not going to be completely bulletproof, but Reason with REs is still way more stable than other DAWs I've used.

and my point about ease of use was more aimed at installation and maintenance of the plugin/RE. back when I used to actually use VSTs, I recall a number of times where I had to go through a bunch of BS just to get them installed and working properly with Digital Performer. Rack Extensions, by comparison are stupidly easy. go to the store, try/buy it, let it download and authorize, and open Reason.
My non RE plugins just install and are ready to use this easy. Everything is very easy today. Only thing is, Propellerhead will NOT implement AU/VST support unless they are ready to say goodbye to their RE protocol. I am not voting because i don't need AU/VST in Reason, I already have a DAW, but I see no reason to be against it. If you are afraid of instability or complex installation procedures, you just don't buy the product, right?
  #8  
Old 2013-08-22, 16:42
guitfnky's Avatar
guitfnky guitfnky is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 644
true. I agree that it is a moot point, because it's just not going to happen. mostly, I was just playing devil's advocate to Recurse's statement.
  #9  
Old 2013-08-22, 16:45
Exowildebeest Exowildebeest is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,775
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonezMcCoy View Post
Everything is very easy today.
Oh yeah?

Try opening a plastic pack of scissors...
  #10  
Old 2013-08-22, 17:04
phasys's Avatar
phasys phasys is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,891
__________________
"Having unlimited choices can paralyze you creatively." - David Byrne

"Some questions simply do not deserve an answer." - Richard Dawkins

https://soundcloud.com/dutch-bastard

omfg one million megahurz CPU
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VOTE for Reason to win best DAW! joeyluck Phead User Forum (read only) 71 2012-06-03 14:02
Please listen (and vote) for my song mmanla Music Forum (read only) 0 2012-02-02 10:36
Detective theme VOTING Thread - Everybody can vote! Notacet Phead User Forum (read only) 36 2010-04-21 07:35
Please, My Band Needs Your Vote. Only 3 More Days scaryclown Phead User Forum (read only) 1 2006-10-16 00:08
OT: My Band Is Nominated For Best "Indie Act". Vote For Us! scaryclown Phead User Forum (read only) 7 2006-09-14 19:45


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:40.