Propellerhead Software

Go Back   Propellerhead Forum > General Forum (read only)

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 2003-04-02, 11:40
Ola Ola is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1
Why did we only do Reload for Windows XP and Mac OS X?

Since a lot of people have been asking about this, here's an explanation on why Reload is only available for Mac OSX and Windows XP:

Part of the reason is that we are doing low level disk reading here (Akai disks are not compatible with any personal computer operating system), which has to be done partly different for each platform (including XP and 2000, we tested). So a big part of this is a question of where we spend our extremely limited time and resources.

As far as Apple goes, Mac OS 9 is dead and buried. All our titles will be X compatible as soon as we can ever get them there, and there will be a day where all our applications are X only!

While Windows 2000 is not a dead product such as Mac OS 9, there is no question of where things are heading. Work we do on non-current operating system versions has historically proven to very quickly become obsolete after we ship it. And since Reload is a new product, the decision was taken to only support the operating system that Microsoft recommends.

However, there is no real reason to despair. There are several other tools that do (or will do) what Reload does and a lot more too, for example CDXtract and Translator (applications we never intended to compete with). These are, and will forever remain, much more advanced tools than Reload! Reload is a small, free utility application for Reason users that only does one single thing, and does it very well. Just yesterday, we made the NN-XT format available to anyone who wants to develop applications supporting this format (it will be available from this website soon) so you can expect other converters to convert sounds into the NN-XT format in the future.

Where do you prefer we spend most of our development resources? On advanced conversion applications or on cool music applications? For us, the choice is very simple. Reload is a small utility and we'd like to keep it at that.

Right or wrong, good or bad, this is how we came to the answer to this question.

If this text feels familiar to some of you, it's because a slightly different version of it was posted on the Reload beta board a few weeks back.
  #2  
Old 2003-04-02, 11:59
neostorm neostorm is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 0
Re: Why did we only do Reload for Windows XP and Mac OS X?

:If this text feels familiar to some of you, it's because a slightly different version of it was posted on the Reload beta board a few weeks back.
:

All good, thought I was suffering a matrix style
de-ja-vu for a minute there Ola
  #3  
Old 2003-04-02, 12:22
olefski olefski is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 0
Re: Why did we only do Reload for Windows XP and Mac OS X?

Im fine with that answer. I really hope we see some external firms catching up the NNXT format and implement into their converters.

Thanks
Oli
  #4  
Old 2003-04-02, 13:48
michaelj michaelj is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 30
Could you confirm then...

Is Reason 2.5 still going to work on windows 2000 ?

Are future versions of Reason (and Recycle) going to be windows XP only ?

Are you also going to release the refill format ? One of the big advantages (as I see it) with reload is that it will automatically build a refill if necessary.

Thanks for the previous mail, and although I can't say I like the answer, I'm grateful for the information.
  #5  
Old 2003-04-02, 14:32
admin's Avatar
admin admin is offline
Propellerhead
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 263
Re: Could you confirm then...

Reason and ReCycle will still work on Win2000.

We are not going to release the ReFill format for the time being.

/Tage


:Is Reason 2.5 still going to work on windows 2000 ?
:
:Are future versions of Reason (and Recycle) going to be windows XP only ?
:
:Are you also going to release the refill format ? One of the big advantages (as I see it) with reload is that it will automatically build a refill if necessary.
:
:Thanks for the previous mail, and although I can't say I like the answer, I'm grateful for the information.
  #6  
Old 2003-04-02, 14:50
michaelj michaelj is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 30
Thanks (n/t)

  #7  
Old 2003-04-02, 18:08
dries dries is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 0
OS 9 dead?

:well, if all designers working on 9.2.2 would move to sweden........

x-press for OS X is still not ready.......

we must be patient........

and we're the main cash cow for apple.....

why cant make the props a nice bug-free, cheap DTP program for OS X?

:-)





  #8  
Old 2003-04-02, 18:21
roland303 roland303 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 0
Wow Ola that's fantastic news!

:Just yesterday, we made the NN-XT format available to anyone who wants to develop applications supporting this format (it will be available from this website soon) so you can expect other converters to convert sounds into the NN-XT format in the future.

I've been begging for the props to do this for ages. I would love to have an app like CDxtract where I can convert all my EXS sample libraries straight to NN-XT and vice versa.

Thanks for the news!
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 04:02.