SSL vs. Mixer 14:2
Im just wondering if anyone has listened to tracks they did before using just the old Mixer 14:2 and compared its bang for buck against the SSL Mixer?
I find that i got my tracks nice and hard and bumpy with ease with the Mixer 14:2 than i do with the SSL. Not saying i cant get it nice and good with the SSL but..it does tend to clip and distort far quicker it would with the Mixer 14:2.
Could it be that it would be actually better to record Reason instruments connected to the Mixer 14:2 and Live instruments with the SSL? and if so, would it be possible to have an easy way to always have racks connected to the mixer 14:2 when its created?
Should we just stick to plastering everything on the SSL Mixer bringing up another question as to..if thats the case, why is the Mixer 14:2 still there cos i for 1, dont use it any more...i simple use the Line Mixer for sub mixes and i can combine that with the audio splitter thats plenty for me..
Discuss!! in 3...2...1.. *BANG*
Reason 6.5.3, Windows 8 core 2 quad 2,33ghz, 2,34ghz, M-Audio AxiomPro49; Behringer BFC Mixer; KORG padKONTROL, ESI 1010e
"Life is like a Rhythm; Flow with it and you'll be Fine" - Sid Mercutio 1979 - ?
Last edited by SidMercutio; 2012-10-20 at 11:54. Reason: typos
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|New Use for the Reason Mixer 14:2||Camel777||General Forum (read only)||4||2005-11-27 09:31|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:37.